Current thinking
Mikkel Krogsholm publishes when a development in AI changes a real decision for an owner, board or leadership team and he can add first-hand knowledge from work he is doing himself. A product announcement is not enough.
Each piece begins with the work that may change: who owns it, where judgment is required, what evidence exists and where a faster first step could move the bottleneck. Sources establish what happened. Mikkel's practical experience is used to explain what leaders should examine next, and uncertainty stays visible where the evidence is incomplete.
The archive has been reset because the earlier articles supported a different position. New English writing will appear only when it can stand on its own, serve a distinct search need and add more than a translated summary. Until then, the Danish current-analysis section contains the active editorial work, while this page states the publication standard.
The result should be a smaller, more useful archive in which every piece helps a leader decide what to examine, test or leave alone.
Zero articles is the right number today.
The previous writing belonged to a different position and has been withdrawn. A new piece must help a leadership team understand a concrete development, draw on work I know first-hand and add more than a summary of the news.
Do you face a consequential AI decision?
Write about the decision, or ask about a leadership briefing or talk.
Contact me